Safeguarding our Coast and Ocean
Governor Gavin Newsom needs to stand up for the California Coastal Act and the Coastal Commission, which were created through voter support in Proposition 20 nearly 50 years ago. The federal officials’ recent threat to withhold disaster funding is a cruel attack on Los Angeles residents who have already lost so much.
BREAKING! Good news: EAC's petition to turn Drakes Estero into a full marine reserve was approved unanimously at the California Fish and Game Commission meeting in Sacramento on December 11th.
What Does This Mean for Public Access?
The proposed change will not impact public access at all. You will still be able to enjoy the Estero by paddle or foot.
What will Change?
Once the regulation is changed, recreational clamming will no longer be allowed at this location, further protecting the marine biodiversity.
On September 26, 2024, EAC was invited to present at the Golden Gate Collaborative meeting, which was held at the San Francisco Zoo. EAC’s Executive Director, Ashley Eagle-Gibbs presented our marine protected area (MPA) petitions. EAC’s Program Director was also in attendance remotely, and she is one of the Golden Gate Collaborative Co-chairs. Other topics of the meeting included 30x30 public comment on the Draft Framework, group, and collaborative updates.
Sara Worden of the California Fish and Wildlife Department (CDFW) also presented the next steps for the petition process, including prioritizing the review of Bin 1 petitions, which includes EAC’s Drakes Estero petition.
On July 17th, Ashley Eagle-Gibbs (EAC Executive Director) and Amina Khribeche (EAC Legal & Policy summer intern) participated in the Fish and Game Commission’s Marine Resources Committee meeting in Santa Rosa. The July 17th meeting was focused on Marine Protected Area (MPA) regulation change petitions evaluation process and changes to our existing MPA network for adaptive management.
On July 18th, Amina attended the Committee meeting virtually to speak on fisheries and aquaculture issues including, fishery bycatch evaluation for fisheries management review, and applications for new aquaculture leases.
California’s coast is one of the state’s most valuable and scenic resources. Our state boasts over 420 public beaches and approximately 840 miles of coastline, extending from the border of Mexico up to the state of Oregon. Unlike most states, within the California Constitution, the guarantee to the public right of access to our state’s beaches, ocean, and navigable waterways is enshrined. Each and every person is entitled to the enjoyment of our coastline, its recreational opportunities, its beauty, and the natural resources it has to offer.
Given the pristine and diverse nature of California’s coast, it is of paramount concern that the entire coast be protected and preserved, along with the regulatory mechanisms that protect it, such as the California Coastal Act. Unfortunately, the Act has been under attack recently, where housing is being pitted against our coastal resources. Read about EAC's victory in protecting the Act!
Over the past year, we played a pivotal role as the fiscal sponsor for the Cleaner California Coast Initiative, managing efforts across Marin, Sonoma, and Mendocino counties. This initiative aims to preserve California's coastal regions through public education, community engagement, and conservation activities, promoting responsible recreation and reducing pollution. By partnering with the Leave No Trace organization and local, state, and federal working group members, we ensured the use of best practices for environmental stewardship.
There's a popular belief among some members of the state Legislature that coastal protection policies are preventing developers from building multifamily housing in coastal cities.
But where’s the evidence? When pressed, supporters of bills like AB 2560—a proposal to strip away environmental and public access regulations in exchange for more dense housing in the coastal zone—simply point to the complaints from disgruntled developers.
On May 7th, Ashley, Leslie, and Grace went to California's capital to advocate for policies that protect our ocean and coast!
We advocated primarily on phasing out single-use plastic materials, the importance of marine protected areas, making state beaches equitable and accessible for all, engaging tribes and communities in offshore wind, and against AB 2560 a bill that attacks the Coastal Act. We were joined by CALPIRG students who led the plastics advocacy, pushing for a plastic bag ban.
We prepared and submitted two petitions to the California Fish and Game Commission (Commission) on November 30th to request changes in Marine Protected Area (MPA) regulations at two highly vulnerable locations in Marin County: Drakes Estero and Duxbury Reef. We also supplemented our comments on February 1st with additional community support and information. This follows the decadal management review and the need to adaptively manage our MPAs.
Following up on our involvement in the first decadal management review for California’s network of 124 marine protected areas (MPAs), we prepared and submitted two petitions in November to the California Fish and Game Commission (Commission) to request changes in MPA regulations at two locations in Marin County: Drakes Estero and Duxbury Reef. Initially, we submitted comments in March of 2023 and subsequent comments, requesting the Commission review changes to the current regulations based on changed circumstances and to ensure MPA resilience and adaptive management. We followed up with formal petitions in November, including submitting extensive agency, partner, and local support, as well as other relevant information.
The aquaculture public interest criteria (or guidance) were finalized at the August Fish and Game Commission (Commission) meeting. The criteria outline a series of inquiries and clarify the process for prospective aquaculture proposals (including shellfish growing in Tomales Bay and California waters). These unanimously adopted criteria will apply statewide with broad support at the meeting. Alongside the criteria, an enhanced application review process was also adopted.
We have been leading the NGO effort to increase transparency and develop and refine these aquaculture criteria for the last couple of years. Thank you to our partners for their support in getting this across the finish line! The successful adoption of these criteria results from extensive public comments (written and presented), as well as coordination with staff, Commissioners, and NGO partners.
The 8th annual State of Tomales Bay conference took place at the end of September at the Inverness Yacht Club. The day was thoughtfully curated and facilitated by the Tomales Bay Foundation Board, bringing together regional partners, including non-profit and business stakeholders, scientific practitioners, local, state and federal land managers, as well as elected leaders who actively collaborated to address the topic of the day: Conservation Challenges with a Changing Climate. Three members of the EAC team, as well as Board members, joined the important event.
The interdisciplinary nature of the conference presentations gave each attendee access to information that educated about the importance of prescribed fires, Tomales Bay aquatic biology, hydrology, birds and butterflies, as well as introduced participants to Marin County’s coordinated response to sea level rise, student research focused on biodiversity, benthic habitat, biological invasions, restoration success stories, and predation on marine mammals.
An important topic at the California Fish and Game Commission's July Marine Resources Committee meeting was Aquaculture Leasing in California (Item 4) and specifically, the development of public interest criteria to help guide the Fish and Game Commission and the Fish and Wildlife Department in their new leasing decisions, so that the Commission can ensure newly sited leases take into account important considerations such as impacts to our sensitive coastal environment, eelgrass habitat, recreation, and navigation. We have been engaged in the development of these criteria for the last couple of years, and we are excited that the criteria are close to being finalized. Draft 3 will be released shortly and reviewed at the August Fish and Game Commission meeting next week.
The EAC team including our stellar summer interns participated at the California Fish and Game Commission's Marine Resources Committee meeting in-person in Petaluma in July to advocate for our Marine Protected Areas (or MPAs).
We spoke on a few agenda items including Marine Protected Areas (MPA) Decadal Management Review (Item 5), which is the focus of this article.
Before we dive into the meeting debrief, we wanted to share a little bit about California’s network of MPAs and how they were created.
Our advocacy to protect Tomales Bay’s unique habitats and species from poorly sited development continues, as we push the California Fish and Game Commission (FGC) to create statewide aquaculture public interest criteria, which will be implemented prior to the issuance of new aquaculture leases.
We need your help to ensure the FGC understands this issue is important to our membership. Please Complete this Google Form by adding your name and feedback, so we can emphasize the importance of this issue at the FGC Marine Resources Meeting on July 20th. We also encourage you to send in your own written comments separately by July 7th at 5 PM. See more info. below re. submitting individual comments.
It’s been 10 years since California’s network of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) were established. California’s ambitious plan to establish an interconnected network of 124 MPAs along the coast is an international example of adaptive conservation and management, and we are proud to have been part of the process from the very beginning stages of community meetings. Here in Marin County, we are fortunate to have six MPAs, two State Marine Parks, and three Special Closures at some of our favorite coastal areas like Drakes Estero, Drakes Beach, and Duxbury Reef.
In 1999, California passed the California Marine Life Protection Act (MLPA) requiring the state to create an interconnected ecological network of 124 Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) to protect and sustain the diverse marine life and coastal and ocean habitats through adaptive ecological management strategies. A key part of the adaptive management plan included the development of four-pillars that would guide the implementation of the MLPA to ensure the MPA network was meeting its goals.
At the end of the year, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) released the first ever review of the MPA network in their report, California Marine Protected Area Decadal Management Review. The report reviews the last 10-years of research and monitoring; outreach and education; policy and permitting; and enforcement and compliance activities. It also provides the public with information and recommendations for the future to address knowledge gaps and changing environmental and socioeconomic conditions.
The Fish and Game Commission is in the process of developing criteria for when a new aquaculture lease is or is not found to be in the public interest, which is required under state law. Public interest criteria will be applied when new lease applications are submitted — like the proposed lease by San Andreas Shellfish near the mouth of Tomales Bay. In 2022, EAC participated in a number of public meetings on this topic, attended workshops, coordinated with partners and agency staff, and reviewed and commented on two rounds of draft criteria.
EAC has been actively following the development of the statewide aquaculture action plan, advocating for a strong plan consistent with the Ocean Protection Council’s strategic plan that explicitly identifies and addresses marine aquaculture impacts. We participated in a working group on this topic, we have spoken at agency meetings, and we meet with OPC staff. In December 2022, we submitted a detailed comment letter with 9 partners, providing feedback on the finalized statewide Guiding Principles for Sustainable Marine Aquaculture and feedback on the forthcoming aquaculture action plan. Our letter also included our collective opposition to marine finfish.
